ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2026
Successful endoscopic drainage for gastropericardial fistula caused by a gastric conduit ulcer after esophagectomy.
Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric conduit ulcer is a postoperative complication of esophagectomy. However, penetration into the pericardium is extremely rare and often fatal. Although surgical drainage is standard treatment, optimal management when surgery is difficult remains unclear. A 60-year-old man in shock was transferred to our hospital 2 years after mediastinoscopic esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction for esophageal cancer. Computed tomography revealed air and fluid in the pericardial cavity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a perforated gastric conduit ulcer. The patient was diagnosed with mediastinitis and purulent pericarditis. Emergency laparoscopic transhiatal exploration and placement of a chest tube in the left pleural cavity were performed; however, dense adhesions prevented access to the perforation site and pericardial cavity. Because direct pericardial drainage could not be achieved, endoscopic drainage was performed, resulting in rapid improvement of inflammatory findings and a favorable outcome. Few cases of pericardial penetration caused by gastric conduit ulcers have been reported, all showing a rapidly progressive course. Therefore, this condition should be considered an acute, life-threatening event requiring prompt management. Adjunctive endoscopic drainage may serve as a complementary rescue option in selected patients when conventional surgical or percutaneous access to the pericardial cavity is technically difficult or fails to achieve direct drainage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42848123What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.