Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42848108›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026

Accuracy of minimally invasive hemoglobin monitoring in the perioperative period: transcutaneous hemoglobin monitoring and point-of-care testing devices: prospective observational study.

Shotaro Sakimura, Kaiki Oya, Yuka Sakaguchi, Ken Yamaura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shotaro SakimuraOperating Rooms, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. sakimura.shotaro.439@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2913-8313
Kaiki OyaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3479-6707
Yuka SakaguchiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4109-5426
Ken YamauraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9392-1746

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the perioperative performance of two minimally/non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring modalities-continuous pulse hemoglobin (SpHb) (Revision O: rev. O) and intermittent point-of-care testing (POCT) using HemoCue® Hb801-against an automated hematology analyzer as the reference standard. Fifty patients undergoing general anesthesia with invasive arterial monitoring for surgery with anticipated blood loss were enrolled prospectively. A total of 281 arterial blood samples were analyzed by an automated hematology analyzer (reference standard), a blood gas analyzer, and HemoCue® Hb801; all comparisons, including HemoCue®, used arterial rather than capillary blood. SpHb (rev. O) was monitored continuously. Correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were performed, and polar plot analysis of changes between successive sampling points assessed SpHb trend-tracking. HemoCue® Hb801 agreed closely with the reference (r = 0.979; bias 0.119 g/dL; limits of agreement [LOA] -0.687 to +0.925 g/dL). SpHb correlated with the reference (r = 0.777) but showed wide LOA (- 2.114 to +2.811 g/dL), proportional bias, and greater random error at perfusion index <1.4 (87/281 measurements, 31.0%). In polar plot analysis of 23 successive-change pairs from 9 patients, angular bias was - 5.8° (95% CI -12.2° to +0.5°) and four-quadrant concordance 100%, but radial limits of agreement (- 36.3° to +24.6°) exceeded the ±30° criterion. HemoCue® Hb801 provided accurate Hb measurement from a minimal arterial sample. SpHb (rev. O) had limited absolute accuracy and could not quantify the magnitude of change within accepted limits, but reliably indicated its direction. A hybrid approach-continuous SpHb monitoring triggering confirmatory HemoCue® measurement-may support safer perioperative hemoglobin management.

Indexed as

Hemoglobin accuracyMinimally invasive hemoglobin monitoringPerioperative hemoglobin level managementPoint-of-Care Testing (POCT)SpHb

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.