ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Evaluation and correction of charcoal-stripped serum matrix bias in stable-isotope-dilution LC-MS/MS quantification of endogenous serum folates.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Isotope-dilution LC-MS/MS is widely used for targeted quantification of endogenous metabolites, but surrogate-matrix calibration can remain biased when the surrogate matrix is noncommutable with native specimens. In this study, three endogenous serum folate vitamers were quantified by stable-isotope-dilution LC-MS/MS using charcoal-stripped serum (CSS) as a surrogate blank matrix. Post-extraction spiking and pooled-serum standard addition showed analyte-dependent and batch-dependent matrix bias between CSS and native serum. Standard addition comparison revealed matrix factors of 1.005 to 1.611 for 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-mTHF), 0.607 to 1.000 for folic acid (FA), and 0.902 to 1.008 for folinic acid, indicating a higher analyte-to-internal-standard normalized response in native serum relative to CSS for 5-mTHF, a lower normalized response for FA, and minimal matrix-dependent response difference for folinic acid. To address this bias, we developed a pooled-serum, batch-specific matrix-factor correction workflow based on standard addition. This approach estimates matrix factors in pooled native serum and applies them to CSS-calibrated concentrations generated under the same batch conditions, avoiding the sample-volume burden of conventional standard addition. Matrix-factor correction reduced validation bias for 5-mTHF and FA to within the predefined ± 15% criterion. In 64 clinical serum samples, correction changed classification relative to selected total folate reference decision limits (5-21 ng/mL) in ten samples (15.6%) for 5-mTHF and five samples (7.8%) for FA. These findings show that CSS-based stable-isotope-dilution LC-MS/MS can produce residual matrix-dependent bias despite normalization using stable-isotope-labeled internal standards (SIL-IS), and that pooled-serum standard addition provides a practical correction strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42848078What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.