Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42847833›Full record

ArticleBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2026

Investigating Potential Adverse Drug Reactions of Lisdexamfetamine Using Sequence Symmetry Analysis.

Thomas Leth Jensen, Sanne Møller Thysen, Espen Jimenez-Solem, Anders Jørgensen, Camilla Bjørn Jensen, Hans Kristian Råket, Merete Osler, Mads Nielsen, Lars Christian Lund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas Leth JensenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7546-7367
Sanne Møller ThysenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4541-3901
Espen Jimenez-SolemDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3777-147X
Anders JørgensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6012-6965
Camilla Bjørn JensenCopenhagen Phase IV Unit (Phase4CPH), Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8224-4601
Hans Kristian RåketDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7959-1548
Merete OslerSection of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6921-220X
Mads NielsenPioneer Centre for AI, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1535-068X
Lars Christian LundCenter for Clinical Research and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health Prevention, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8651-6072

Funding

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of ADHD is increasing rapidly, and lisdexamfetamine is increasingly popular, but few studies investigate its safety. We performed a sequence symmetry analysis (SSA) using Danish register data to identify potential ADRs associated with lisdexamfetamine in 2013-2023. Outcomes were incident prescriptions or incident discharge diagnoses. We calculated trend-adjusted sequence ratios (SR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We additionally performed two comparator SSAs for the same outcomes following incident use of stimulants (methylphenidate and dexamfetamine) or non-stimulants (guanfacine and atomoxetine). This study is reported according to RECORD-PE guidelines. We included 48 740 incident lisdexamfetamine users with a median age of 24 years (IQR 16-35). SRs were calculated for 1426 exposure-diagnosis and 1337 exposure-prescription pairs. The 50 highest SRs from each category were evaluated. Among these, 28 exposure-outcome combinations had a 95% CI lower bound above 1. Of the 100 outcomes, 33 were considered known ADRs, while 60 were previously unknown. Two outcomes indicating increased urinary symptoms were identified ('hematuria', SR: 1.88 [95% CI: 1.25; 2.85] and 'other urinary symptoms', SR: 1.63 [1.20; 2.23]). We also identified serious gastrointestinal outcomes as a potential safety alert. Further investigation into these symptoms as potential ADRs is warranted.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsLisdexamfetamine DimesylateAdolescentAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleRegistriesYoung AdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsLisdexamfetamine DimesylateADHD medicationadverse drug reactionslisdexamfetaminepharmacovigilancesequence symmetry analysis

Identifiers

PMID42847833
PMCPMC13648219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.