ArticleBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2026
Investigating Potential Adverse Drug Reactions of Lisdexamfetamine Using Sequence Symmetry Analysis.
Article in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prevalence of ADHD is increasing rapidly, and lisdexamfetamine is increasingly popular, but few studies investigate its safety. We performed a sequence symmetry analysis (SSA) using Danish register data to identify potential ADRs associated with lisdexamfetamine in 2013-2023. Outcomes were incident prescriptions or incident discharge diagnoses. We calculated trend-adjusted sequence ratios (SR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We additionally performed two comparator SSAs for the same outcomes following incident use of stimulants (methylphenidate and dexamfetamine) or non-stimulants (guanfacine and atomoxetine). This study is reported according to RECORD-PE guidelines. We included 48 740 incident lisdexamfetamine users with a median age of 24 years (IQR 16-35). SRs were calculated for 1426 exposure-diagnosis and 1337 exposure-prescription pairs. The 50 highest SRs from each category were evaluated. Among these, 28 exposure-outcome combinations had a 95% CI lower bound above 1. Of the 100 outcomes, 33 were considered known ADRs, while 60 were previously unknown. Two outcomes indicating increased urinary symptoms were identified ('hematuria', SR: 1.88 [95% CI: 1.25; 2.85] and 'other urinary symptoms', SR: 1.63 [1.20; 2.23]). We also identified serious gastrointestinal outcomes as a potential safety alert. Further investigation into these symptoms as potential ADRs is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.