Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42847792›Full record

ReviewJournal of veterinary science2026

Genomic-guided precision oncology in canine cancer: from comparative genomics to liquid biopsy and molecular monitoring.

Minjeong Kang, Jaemin Kim, Jinho Park, DoHyeon Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Minjeong KangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9145-2050
Jaemin KimInstitute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1746-2546
Jinho ParkCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Jeonbuk National University, Iksan 54596, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5235-5717
DoHyeon YuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7645-6926

Funding

Rural Development Administration PJ01690702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceTraditional cancer diagnostics in veterinary medicine are limited by invasiveness and insufficient sensitivity for real-time molecular monitoring. This review critically evaluates the clinical applicability of somatic mutation profiling and liquid biopsy technologies to establish an evidence-based, tiered framework for precision oncology in canine patients, with emphasis on veterinary-specific constraints and technology selection. OBSERVATIONS: Key somatic biomarkers demonstrate strong clinical utility: BRAF V595E achieves > 80% diagnostic sensitivity in canine urothelial carcinoma and is detectable non-invasively in urine via droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). The multicenter cancer detection in dogs (CANDiD) study demonstrated circulating tumor DNA-based liquid biopsy achieves 54.7% overall sensitivity and 98.5% specificity, though stage I detection remains critically limited at 16.1%, underscoring the current gap for early-stage screening. Minimal residual disease assessment via allele-specific oligonucleotide-PCR and next-generation sequencing enables detection of molecular relapse 42-168 days before clinical manifestation in canine lymphoma. However, analytical variability across platforms, lack of standardized pipelines, and high cost represent significant barriers to routine veterinary application. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Genomic-guided oncology offers substantial clinical value for canine cancer management yet requires veterinary-specific validation before broad adoption. Targeted sequencing panels currently represent the optimal balance of cost-effectiveness and clinical utility for most veterinary practitioners, while ddPCR is preferred for longitudinal tracking of known mutations. Liquid biopsy cannot serve as a standalone screening tool at present, but functions as a valuable complementary monitoring approach. Continued canine-specific biomarker research and multicenter data sharing are essential prerequisites for integrating precision medicine into routine veterinary care.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesGenomicsNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorDogsLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, Tumorcirculating tumor DNAminimal residual diseaseNeoplasmsnext-generation sequencingprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID42847792
PMCPMC13655552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.