ReviewJournal of veterinary science2026
Genomic-guided precision oncology in canine cancer: from comparative genomics to liquid biopsy and molecular monitoring.
Review in Journal of veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceTraditional cancer diagnostics in veterinary medicine are limited by invasiveness and insufficient sensitivity for real-time molecular monitoring. This review critically evaluates the clinical applicability of somatic mutation profiling and liquid biopsy technologies to establish an evidence-based, tiered framework for precision oncology in canine patients, with emphasis on veterinary-specific constraints and technology selection. OBSERVATIONS: Key somatic biomarkers demonstrate strong clinical utility: BRAF V595E achieves > 80% diagnostic sensitivity in canine urothelial carcinoma and is detectable non-invasively in urine via droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). The multicenter cancer detection in dogs (CANDiD) study demonstrated circulating tumor DNA-based liquid biopsy achieves 54.7% overall sensitivity and 98.5% specificity, though stage I detection remains critically limited at 16.1%, underscoring the current gap for early-stage screening. Minimal residual disease assessment via allele-specific oligonucleotide-PCR and next-generation sequencing enables detection of molecular relapse 42-168 days before clinical manifestation in canine lymphoma. However, analytical variability across platforms, lack of standardized pipelines, and high cost represent significant barriers to routine veterinary application. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Genomic-guided oncology offers substantial clinical value for canine cancer management yet requires veterinary-specific validation before broad adoption. Targeted sequencing panels currently represent the optimal balance of cost-effectiveness and clinical utility for most veterinary practitioners, while ddPCR is preferred for longitudinal tracking of known mutations. Liquid biopsy cannot serve as a standalone screening tool at present, but functions as a valuable complementary monitoring approach. Continued canine-specific biomarker research and multicenter data sharing are essential prerequisites for integrating precision medicine into routine veterinary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.