ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
iProDNet: integrated probabilistic differential network inference under heterogeneous biological conditions.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding phenotype-specific network rewiring is essential for elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying complex diseases. Although numerous differential network analysis methods have been developed, most focus on only a limited aspect of network information. Consequently, these approaches often fail to jointly characterize regulatory activity and network architecture, provide limited statistical evidence at the network level, and offer little capability for prioritizing key genes that drive phenotype-specific network rewiring. To address these limitations, we developed a novel computational framework, integrated probabilistic differential network analysis (iProDNet), for identifying phenotype-specific regulatory modules under heterogeneous biological conditions. A key feature of iProDNet is the integration of regulatory effects and network topological characteristics into a unified network-aware gene activity score. The framework further transforms gene-level differential activity into network-level statistical evidence using a nonparametric log-likelihood ratio approach and naturally prioritizes genes that contribute to phenotype-specific network rewiring. We evaluated iProDNet through Monte Carlo simulations and compared its performance with existing methods. Across diverse simulation settings, iProDNet consistently achieved superior discriminative performance while maintaining a balanced tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity. We further applied iProDNet to whole-blood RNA-sequencing data generated by the Japan Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID19) Task Force to identify molecular interactions associated with severe COVID19. The proposed framework identified distinct rewired subnetworks related to immune regulation, ribosome-mediated translation, and interferon-driven antiviral responses. Furthermore, iProDNet successfully prioritized biologically relevant markers, including B2M, ISG15, and multiple ribosomal protein genes, all of which have previously been implicated in COVID19 severity and antiviral immunity. These results demonstrate that iProDNet provides a statistically robust and biologically interpretable framework for identifying phenotype-specific regulatory modules and key regulatory drivers. As such, it offers new opportunities for investigating molecular rewiring mechanisms and discovering disease-associated therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.