ArticleMolecular ecology2026
Phylogeographic Breaks With and Without Contemporary Barriers to Migration in the Lizard Acanthodactylus erythrurus.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying phylogeographic breaks and deciphering the relative contributions of environmental extrinsic (e.g., geological barriers, ecological gradients) and organismal intrinsic (e.g., limited dispersal, reproductive incompatibilities) factors to their persistence remain challenging, especially in the absence of genomic data. Here, we address this issue using parapatric lineages of the lizard Acanthodactylus erythrurus in south-western Morocco. A previous study based on nine nuclear loci identified two phylogeographic units (coastal vs. inland) whose separation did not align with landscape features preventing migration. The coastal lineage was inferred to evolve under isolation by distance (IBD, the regular increase of genetic differentiation with geographic distance), despite the presence of large rivers across its range. This suggests either that phylogeographic breaks do not align with landscape features, or that the restricted marker set prevented an accurate inference of phylogeographic breaks. We tested these hypotheses using RADseq data and recovered three lineages, each separated by phylogeographic breaks and narrow contact zones with restricted admixture. Coastal populations that had been previously identified to evolve under IBD actually included two lineages separated by a major, permanent river, reducing migration. The inland phylogeographic break, correctly identified by the previous study, is located in a continuously distributed habitat. Neither of the breaks aligned with steep changes in bioclimatic variables, suggesting a negligible contribution of local adaptation. We conclude that intrinsic reproductive barriers, as evidenced by narrow clines in allele frequencies at multiple loci spread over the genome, play a major role in maintaining these phylogeographic breaks. Our results also highlight the difficulty of identifying phylogeographic breaks from pre-genomic molecular data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.