ArticleSICOT-J2026
Pronator quadratus-sparing volar plating of distal radius fractures: A prospective study.
Article in SICOT-J, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVolar locked plates for the distal radius fractures (DRFs) are applied through the Henry approach, and its modification entails a routine step to disinsert the pronator quadratus from its radial and distal attachments. This muscle insertion is mostly fleshy with minimal tendinous tissue, and surgeons find it difficult to reattach at the end of the surgery, the hardware comes in direct contact with the flexor tendons.
methodsThe study was performed as a single-center prospective case series to investigate the possibility of preserving the pronator quadratus and, at the same time, achieving good reduction. Out of 73 patients enrolled in the study, the pronator quadratus was successfully spared in 60 patients. The quality of reduction and fixation in these patients was assessed functionally and radiologically.
resultsCases showed radiographic union commencing 3 months postoperatively. Twenty-nine cases had to wait for the 6th months follow up radiographs. No case had a nonunion of its fracture. The PQ sparing approach can be shifted to the FCR approach when needed. In our series, the pronator quadratus muscle was taken down in 4 patients, where a satisfactory reduction could not be achieved.
conclusionPQ sparing approach is readily adopted and can be used for the majority of DRFs, achieving a good functional and radiological outcome. Its use can enhance recovery and reduce hardware-related complications. Nonetheless, reduction should not be compromised, and the PQ sparing can be converted readily to the FCR approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.