Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42847495›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Variability in Stroke Journeys: A Qualitative Study of Experiences of Persons With Stroke.

Asma Sabri, Heidi Dombestein, Peter Dieckmann, Stephen J M Sollid, Karina Aase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asma SabriDepartment of Quality and Health Technology, SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8745-3022
Heidi DombesteinDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7478-2429
Peter DieckmannDepartment of Engineering Technology and Didactics, Section Leadership and Strategy Development, Danish Technical University (DTU), Ballerup, Denmark.
Stephen J M SollidDepartment of Quality and Health Technology, SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5543-0057
Karina AaseDepartment of Quality and Health Technology, SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5363-5152

Funding

European Commission 101072843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke recovery is highly individual and often involves multiple transitions across healthcare settings. While standardised stroke pathways aim to improve quality of care, less is known about how persons with stroke experience person-centred practice throughout their stroke journeys.

aimTo explore how persons with stroke experience person-centred practice throughout their stroke journeys.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted with persons who had experienced stroke in Norway. Data were collected through twelve semi-structured interviews and one written response. Reflexive thematic analysis, narrative construction and patient journey mapping were used to explore their experiences across the first 3 months post-stroke onset.

resultsParticipants' stroke journeys varied considerably in symptom presentation, needs and care experiences. Journey mapping visualised the differences in stroke journeys, healthcare interactions and experiences. Four themes were identified from the cross-interview analysis: (1) Professional competence and relational care, (2) When the stroke pathway ends, the person's journey continues, (3) Standardised care versus individualised needs and (4) Participation across the journey. Experiences were generally positive in the hyperacute and acute phases and more variable following discharge, with participants describing limited follow-up and access to rehabilitation, as well as unmet holistic needs.

conclusionsPersons with stroke experiences varied considerably throughout their stroke journeys, with discharge to home regarded as a stressful, insufficiently supported phase of care. Supporting continuity and individualised approaches to care should better meet the diverse needs of persons with stroke. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A user group consisting of persons with stroke and informal caregivers was recruited through a Norwegian stroke survivors association to be involved throughout the study. The user group consisted of seven persons, four females and three males, with ages ranging from their 40s to their 80s. The group included persons with stroke, persons with severe stroke, a person with aphasia, informal caregivers and the leader of the stroke association, who is also an informal caregiver. Two meetings, text communications and individual informal conversations took place with the user group to present and discuss the study design and obtain feedback on the interview content, format and procedures. The user group also supported participant recruitment. These participants took part in the interviews that form the basis of this study. Informal caregiver interviews were conducted in parallel as part of a related study. Preliminary findings were presented at the stroke survivors association's conference, and feedback was obtained.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPatient-Centered CareQualitative Researchjourney mappingpatient experiencesperson‐centredqualitativestroke

Identifiers

PMID42847495
PMCPMC13648015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.