Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42847260›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2026

Chemical reactions for the ligand-directed modification of native proteins.

Anissa Haim, Cassandra J Henderson, Merve Akdeniz, Timothy Noël, Tom N Grossmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anissa HaimDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1836-6396
Cassandra J HendersonFlow Chemistry Group, Van't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.noel@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7402-6375
Merve AkdenizFlow Chemistry Group, Van't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.noel@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9283-4407
Timothy NoëlFlow Chemistry Group, Van't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.noel@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3107-6927
Tom N GrossmannDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0179-4116

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective modifications of native proteins provide powerful opportunities to study and manipulate biological systems, yet achieving site-selective functionalization remains challenging due to the surfeit of competing amino acids, often addressed by genetic engineering of target proteins. Ligand-directed protein modification addresses these limitations by exploiting reversible molecular recognition to position reactive groups in proximity to a defined protein site, thereby enabling selective covalent modification of native proteins under physiological conditions. Importantly, ligand-directed protein modification is evolving from a specialized labeling methodology into a versatile platform for the selective manipulation of protein function in native biological environments. In this review, we discuss recent advances in ligand-directed strategies that employ synthetically accessible small molecules and peptides as recognition elements. Current approaches are categorized into (i) ligation reactions, in which the ligand remains attached to the protein, (ii) transfer reactions, which install a functional moiety while releasing the ligand, and (iii) ligand-directed catalysis, where ligand-tethered catalysts promote protein-substrate reactions with catalytic turnover. For each strategy, employed chemical reactions, amino acid selectivities, and applications in chemical biology and biotechnology are described. We further compare the strengths and limitations of these approaches considering the balance between reactivity, selectivity, and biocompatibility.

Identifiers

PMID42847260
PMCPMC13647452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.