ArticleNursing in critical care2026
The Sleepless Watch: Perceived Sleep Quality of Nurses Working in High-Intensity Settings.
Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoor sleep quality is a global health concern among nurses, particularly in high-intensity settings. Unpredictable workloads, extended shifts and high patient acuity compromise sleep quality, negatively affecting nurses' well-being and patient outcomes.
aimTo describe the perceived sleep quality of nurses working in high-intensity settings. STUDY
designA qualitative descriptive design was used. Purposive sampling was used to select participants who met the inclusion criteria. Data were collected through three semi-structured focus group discussions with 21 nurses working in high-intensity units of an academic hospital in Gauteng, South Africa. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data manually, and the COREQ guidelines were followed.
findingsThree major themes emerged: barriers to quality sleep, consequences of poor sleep and coping mechanisms. Participants described environmental, occupational, organisational and domestic barriers to quality sleep, including community noise, long working hours, staff shortages, inadequate resources and family responsibilities. Poor sleep was associated with emotional exhaustion, impaired concentration and perceived patient safety risks. Participants reported using pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies to manage fatigue and sleep difficulties.
conclusionsThis study highlights that sleep disruption among nurses working in high-intensity settings is shaped by environmental, occupational, organisational, community and family-related factors. Poor sleep was perceived to be associated with emotional exhaustion, impaired concentration, patient safety concerns and reliance on adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies to manage fatigue and insomnia. These findings suggest that sleep disruption is a systemic issue requiring organisational and context-sensitive interventions to improve nurses' well-being and patient care outcomes. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Improving nurses' well-being and patient safety requires interventions that address the organisational, environmental and social contributors to sleep disruption. Supportive practice environments, adequate staffing, fatigue management initiatives and psychosocial support may improve sleep quality, reduce emotional exhaustion and clinical errors and enhance nurse well-being and patient care outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42847257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.