ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Improved patient value after implementing same day discharge for patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation.
Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsPulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective intervention to treat atrial fibrillation, which is increasingly prevalent. Same-day discharge (SDD) is a strategic approach to limit procedure-related costs. This study aimed to compare healthcare utilization, costs, and clinical outcomes before and after implementation of an SDD protocol. METHODS AND
resultsThis retrospective study included 2987 patients undergoing PVI between 1 January 2016 and 1 April 2021. Baseline characteristics, pre-, peri-, and post-procedure healthcare utilization and clinical outcomes were compared before (cohort A; n = 1379) and after (Cohort B; n = 1608) implementation of the SDD protocol using bivariate and multivariate analyses. show that cohort B vs. cohort A had lower all-cause 90-day mortality (0% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.031), no differences in re-ablation < 1 year (P = 0.286), as well as in complications: bleedings (P = 0.177), tamponade < 30 days (P = 0.157), phrenic nerve injury (P = 0.984), thromboembolic complication < 72 h (P = 0.212), or vascular complications (P = 0.290). In terms of healthcare utilization and costs, cohort B had significantly less peri-procedure hospital admission costs (€721.52 vs. €1011.78, P < 0.001) and less total peri- and post-procedure costs (€840.37 vs. €1152.94, P < 0.001). Adjusted for all baseline characteristics, the post-implementation cohort showed on average €315 lower total costs per patient.
conclusionThe implementation of the SDD protocol was associated with comparable complication rates while significantly reducing both peri- and post-procedure healthcare utilization and costs, thereby enhancing patient value. This indicates a potential margin for further cost reductions and increased efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.