ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026
Topical
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Persistent cutaneous inflammation and oxidative stress drive the promotion stage of skin carcinogenesis. Most evidence for Methods: Thirty-five male Swiss albino mice were randomized to seven groups (n = 5): negative control, TPA control, TPA + vehicle cream, TPA + 1% hydrocortisone, and TPA + GMPE cream at 2.5%, 5%, and 10%. GMPE was standardized for α-mangostin by ultra-performance liquid chromatography. Cutaneous tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α; ELISA) and malondialdehyde (MDA; TBARS assay) were measured, and epidermal thickness, neutrophil infiltration, and immunohistochemical TNF-α and MDA expression (immunoreactive score, IRS) were assessed by a blinded observer. Results: GMPE contained 17.54 ± 0.03% (w/w) α-mangostin. TPA raised TNF-α from 22.03 ± 11.43 to 77.03 ± 17.50 pg/mL and MDA from 0.48 ± 0.13 to 0.92 ± 0.10 nmol/mL, increased epidermal thickness fivefold, and induced neutrophil infiltration (all p < 0.001). GMPE 10% lowered TNF-α to 24.81 ± 11.85 pg/mL and MDA to 0.48 ± 0.10 nmol/mL, values not different from healthy skin or from hydrocortisone, and restored epidermal thickness (50 ± 20 µm). Immunohistochemistry confirmed these changes. A linear concentration-response was significant for MDA (p = 0.001). Conclusion: In this experimental animal study, topical GMPE exerted concentration-related anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects in acute TPA-induced skin inflammation, and the 10% cream performed comparably to 1% hydrocortisone. Because signaling pathways and tumor endpoints were not measured, GMPE may serve as a promising preclinical candidate for mechanistic and long-term chemoprevention studies rather than a proven modulator of tumor promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.