ReviewJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2026
Embedding FAIR Data Practices in Shared Core Resource Facilities.
Review in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data fragmentation, lack of standardization, and incomplete clinical context limit the utility and reuse of datasets in biomedical research. Core facilities (shared resources) generate a large portion of research data and are well positioned to implement FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data practices to align with the NIH Data Management and Sharing Policy. This article highlights strategies for incorporating FAIR data practices into core facility workflows. Core facilities generate diverse data types across multiple platforms. However, variability in data formats and metadata practices can pose challenges for interoperability and cross-study integration. A critical first step in addressing this challenge is to connect core-generated datasets derived from patient biospecimens with structured clinical metadata. This involves using standardized identifiers, integration with biobanks and electronic health records. Structured metadata capture during experimental workflows to ensure data provenance will enable meaningful downstream analysis. Equally important is the adoption of standardized data formats and metadata frameworks across technologies. Adoption of community standards for various data types, along with standard metadata schemas, improves data discoverability and reuse. Robust institutional infrastructure (e.g. laboratory information management systems, integrated data platforms) and coordinated governance frameworks can help to implement these efforts. Partnerships with institutional stakeholders and targeted workforce training further support the consistent implementation of effective data stewardship practices. These approaches position core facilities as central operational hubs for advancing FAIR data principles, enhancing reproducibility, and maximizing the long-term value of biomedical research data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.