Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42847101›Full record

ArticleCancer care research online2026

How Can We Reach You? An Overview of Establishing Effective Recruitment Strategies for Young Women Breast Cancer Survivors.

Pearman D Parker, Tiffany A Bogan, Traci A Owen, Reid D Landes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer care research online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pearman D ParkerCollege of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas (Parker and Bogan); Intimate Pathways Center for Sexual Health, Broken Arrow, Oklahoma (Owen); College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas (Landes).
Tiffany A BoganCollege of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas (Parker and Bogan); Intimate Pathways Center for Sexual Health, Broken Arrow, Oklahoma (Owen); College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas (Landes).
Traci A OwenCollege of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas (Parker and Bogan); Intimate Pathways Center for Sexual Health, Broken Arrow, Oklahoma (Owen); College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas (Landes).
Reid D LandesCollege of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas (Parker and Bogan); Intimate Pathways Center for Sexual Health, Broken Arrow, Oklahoma (Owen); College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas (Landes).

Funding

The Role o f Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) Bioavailability in Radiation-induced Skin InjuryP20GM109005 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BOERMA, MARJAN · 2015 to 2024
$21.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Young women (aged 18-50) breast cancer survivors often face troubling sexual side effects resulting from cancer and cancer treatment. Research interventions can target young women's unique needs, but recruitment for this population remains a challenge. Objective: We sought to determine an effective strategy to recruit young women breast cancer survivors for our remote, nurse-led sexual health psychoeducational intervention EMBRACE (Empowerment through Mind and Body Reclamation After Cancer Experience). Methods: Our 5 major recruitment methods were: (1) using a study website; (2) distributing a digital study flyer; (3) placing physical rack cards in 2 nearby states; (4) employing snowball sampling through word-of-mouth; and (5) sharing Facebook posts. Results: Sixty-four young women breast cancer survivors expressed interest in being screened. They learned about our study through Facebook groups (n = 24; 38%), Facebook pages (n = 17; 27%), word-of-mouth (n = 16; 25%), Google searches (n = 4; 6%), and undisclosed searches (n = 3; 4%). Of the 64 women we screened, 55 met eligibility criteria, and 53 provided consent (96.4%). We withdrew 4 women who did not meet eligibility criteria, resulting in a sample of 49 women. Conclusions: Sharing directly with established cancer survivorship Facebook groups was the most effective recruitment strategy. Implications for Practice: Leveraging relationships using social media is the best method for recruiting young women breast cancer survivors. We recommend initiating contact with Facebook groups early in the development of the study. Foundational: Collaborating with partners on social media was the most effective recruitment method.

Indexed as

Breast cancer survivorshipRecruitmentSexual healthSocial mediaYoung women

Identifiers

PMID42847101
PMCPMC13645383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.