ArticleCancer care research online2026
How Can We Reach You? An Overview of Establishing Effective Recruitment Strategies for Young Women Breast Cancer Survivors.
Article in Cancer care research online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Young women (aged 18-50) breast cancer survivors often face troubling sexual side effects resulting from cancer and cancer treatment. Research interventions can target young women's unique needs, but recruitment for this population remains a challenge. Objective: We sought to determine an effective strategy to recruit young women breast cancer survivors for our remote, nurse-led sexual health psychoeducational intervention EMBRACE (Empowerment through Mind and Body Reclamation After Cancer Experience). Methods: Our 5 major recruitment methods were: (1) using a study website; (2) distributing a digital study flyer; (3) placing physical rack cards in 2 nearby states; (4) employing snowball sampling through word-of-mouth; and (5) sharing Facebook posts. Results: Sixty-four young women breast cancer survivors expressed interest in being screened. They learned about our study through Facebook groups (n = 24; 38%), Facebook pages (n = 17; 27%), word-of-mouth (n = 16; 25%), Google searches (n = 4; 6%), and undisclosed searches (n = 3; 4%). Of the 64 women we screened, 55 met eligibility criteria, and 53 provided consent (96.4%). We withdrew 4 women who did not meet eligibility criteria, resulting in a sample of 49 women. Conclusions: Sharing directly with established cancer survivorship Facebook groups was the most effective recruitment strategy. Implications for Practice: Leveraging relationships using social media is the best method for recruiting young women breast cancer survivors. We recommend initiating contact with Facebook groups early in the development of the study. Foundational: Collaborating with partners on social media was the most effective recruitment method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.