Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42847095›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2026

Regional Consortia of Cancer Center Shared Resources: Models for Collaborative Infrastructure and the Emergence of a National Alliance.

Jay W Fox, Gordon Roble

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jay W FoxOffice of Research Core Administration University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4600-1132
Gordon RobleShared Resources Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5760-1930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared resource facilities are foundational to the scientific productivity of National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer centers, yet institutional silos frequently constrain member access to specialized instrumentation and expertise. Interinstitutional consortia of shared resources offer a pragmatic solution, enabling reciprocal service access at internal rates while preserving institutional autonomy. Here we describe two established regional consortia, the Mid-Atlantic Cancer Center Shared Resource Consortium (MACCSRC) and the Fred Hutchinson/University of Washington/Seattle Children's NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center Consortium-examining their organizational frameworks, operational outcomes, and lessons learned. Finally, we introduce the recently organized National Alliance for Cancer Center Shared Resources and discuss how it may serve as an integrating infrastructure connecting regional networks on a national scale. Key considerations for consortium formation, including governance, intellectual property, pricing harmonization, and cost allocation, are addressed.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesNeoplasmsCooperative BehaviorHumansInterinstitutional RelationsNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)United StatesCancer Centerscollaborative infrastructurecore facilitiesInterinstitutional consortiaNCI-designated Cancer Centersresource sharingShared Resources

Identifiers

PMID42847095
PMCPMC13645304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.