ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
A Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians' Perspectives on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Facilitators and Barriers to Care.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Literature has suggested that children experience wide variation in diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), however, multidisciplinary perspectives on barriers and facilitators to care are not well delineated among clinicians. Methods: This qualitative study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines. Participants were recruited until thematic saturation was achieved across the overall dataset. Key informant interviews were conducted with physicians and advanced practice providers from primary care, otolaryngology, and sleep medicine across academic and community practices in both rural and urban settings. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a combined deductive-inductive thematic approach. Results: Sixteen clinicians participated (62.5% female, 50% private vs academic, mean years in practice 12.6 [SD 7.1]), of whom were 56% primary care providers, 31% otolaryngologists, and 13% sleep medicine specialists. Multilevel barriers to SDB care delivery were organized using the socioecological model. Among primary care providers, management of SDB varied considerably with limited use of clinical practice guidelines. Decisions to make a referral were influenced by geographic access to specialists. For clinicians with a large Spanish-speaking population, they frequently described language barriers as important obstacles that negatively affected parental interactions. Limited access to polysomnography was the most significant barrier noted by clinicians in all disciplines and led to changes in provider recommendations and clinical pathways. Conclusion: This qualitative study provides multidisciplinary clinician perspectives on barriers and facilitators to pediatric sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) care across the socioecological framework. The findings identify multilevel factors that shape care pathways and highlight actionable opportunities to improve access, including enhanced caregiver education, standardized referral practices, expanded access to polysomnography, and greater support for clinicians through evidence-based guidance and multidisciplinary collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.