ArticleHousing policy debate2026
The 4Cs of Housing: Resident Perspectives on Cost, Conditions, Consistency, and Context in a Public Housing Neighborhood.
Article in Housing policy debate, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The residential environment, encompassing housing and neighborhood of residence, is a critical context shaping health and well-being. The 4Cs model delineates four pathways through which residential environments affect health including cost, conditions, consistency, and context, all of which are often compromised for low-income individuals. Affordable housing programs, like public housing, should mitigate negative exposures across the 4Cs but disinvestment has left many public housing developments with maintenance deficiencies and disadvantaged contexts. Through analysis of qualitative interviews with 61 residents of a large urban public housing development, we elucidate residents' perspectives of the ways the 4Cs shape experiences and well-being in contemporary public housing. Findings suggest that the 4Cs are interrelated and mutually reinforcing. Participants endured poor conditions and viewed them as a necessary trade-off to maintain consistency, because moves are cost prohibitive and may require moving outside of their neighborhood, losing the amenities and kinship they valued in the context. Impending redevelopment increased fears of disrupted consistency, overshadowing hoped-for improvements in context and conditions. These findings hold important policy implications, as such trade-offs may undermine the goals of the public housing program to provide decent, stable, affordable housing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.