ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2026
Factor XI(a) Inhibition in Secondary Stroke Prevention: On the Cusp of a New Anticoagulation Paradigm.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic stroke remains a leading contributor to global mortality and long-term disability, while bleeding complications, particularly intracranial hemorrhage, continue to constrain the use of conventional antithrombotic therapies for secondary prevention. Factor XI (FXI) has emerged as an attractive therapeutic target because it promotes thrombin amplification and pathological thrombus stabilization while contributing only modestly to physiological hemostasis, forming the basis for "hemostasis-sparing" anticoagulation. Current FXI-targeted approaches include oral small-molecule FXIa inhibitors (asundexian and milvexian), antisense oligonucleotides (fesomersen), and monoclonal antibodies (abelacimab and osocimab). Among these, oral FXIa inhibitors appear particularly suited for long-term cerebrovascular prevention because they provide rapid, reversible target inhibition. Phase II trials, including PACIFIC-Stroke and AXIOMATIC-SSP, showed neutral primary efficacy end points but consistently favorable safety outcomes. More recently, the phase III OCEANIC-STROKE trial demonstrated that asundexian 50 mg once daily added to antiplatelet therapy reduced recurrent ischemic stroke by 26% (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.65-0.84) without a significant increase in major bleeding among patients with noncardioembolic stroke. In contrast, OCEANIC-AF showed inferior efficacy compared with apixaban in atrial fibrillation, suggesting that the therapeutic value of FXIa inhibition is strongly dependent on clinical context. Taken together, this review summarizes the pathophysiological rationale, pharmacology, and clinical evidence supporting FXI inhibition for secondary ischemic stroke prevention and discusses future precision-medicine strategies for patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.