Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42847062›Full record

ReviewInnovation in aging2026

Community-based solutions: a principles-to-practice framework to support individuals living with dementia and their care partners.

Allie Peckham, Monika Roerig, Sage Sadow, Frances Morton-Chang, Laura Schmid, Clare Schuchardt, Molly Budhiraja, Sara Allin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovation in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Allie PeckhamEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6199-6903
Monika RoerigNorth American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sage SadowEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
Frances Morton-ChangInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laura SchmidEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
Clare SchuchardtEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
Molly BudhirajaCollege of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States.
Sara AllinNorth American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Alzheimer's disease and related dementias represent a global public health concern, with persistent gaps in supports for individuals living with dementia and their unpaid care partners. This study synthesized promising community-based innovations that address these gaps and contribute to positive outcomes. Research Design and Methods: A rapid literature review was conducted to develop a framework for guiding the design and evaluation of community innovations for individuals living with dementia and their care partners. 4 databases were searched using keywords related to dementia, care partners, community-based care, and quality outcomes. 22 articles were included, each evaluating a community-based intervention for individuals with dementia and their care partners and reporting outcomes. Cross-study thematic analysis identified programmatic factors associated with success. Results: The resulting framework comprises 6 programmatic factors of success, 6 design and implementation considerations, and 4 cross-cutting principles. Success factors included early intervention, triadic involvement in planning, individualized and person-centered approaches, multi-component interventions, community-building activities, and direct care partner resources and tools. Design and implementation considerations included target population, delivery models, co-design strategies, resource allocation and system incentives, geographic context, and impacts and outcomes. Core principles emphasize anti-stigma, accessibility, equity and intersectionality, and sustainability. Discussion and Implications: Co-design and sustained community engagement were identified as central strategies for reducing stigma and fostering inclusive, dementia-supportive environments. The framework can be used to support the development, investment, and scalability of effective community-based supports for individuals living with dementia and care partners across diverse settings.

Indexed as

Aging in placeCommunity-based careDementia care frameworkRapid literature reviewSustainable care models

Identifiers

PMID42847062
PMCPMC13645434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.