ArticleSouth African journal of sports medicine2026
Common injuries and risk factors in South African long-distance runners over a 12-month period.
Article in South African journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The 12-month incidence of injuries in long-distance running is high, and injury rates vary between 17% and 90%. Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe injury incidence, type, location and risk factors in long-distance runners over the last 12 months. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive, quantitative research design was used. Participants (n=215) were drawn from South African long-distance runners. A previously used online one-year injury recall questionnaire was used to investigate injury incidence, type, location and risk factors. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to develop a model explaining the risk of injury in runners based on significant risk factors. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: In total, 157 injuries were reported by 110 runners (51%). When comparing by sex, 54% of males and 48% of females reported an injury. The sex comparison also showed that males ran significantly faster than females (p=0.04). Most injuries were due to overuse (79%). Common injury locations included the knee (26%), the ankle/foot complex (19%), and the lower leg (18%). There was no significant difference in injury location between male and female runners (p=0.13). Significant injury risk factors identified included: low BMI (p=0.002), greater height (p=0.05), lack of running experience (p=0.05), not warming up (p<0.001), not cooling down (p=0.01), not stretching before running (p=0.004), not stretching after running (p=0.01), and previous injury (p<0.001). Logistic regression analysis, using only the significant injury risk factors, yielded an injury prediction accuracy of 78% (p<0.001). Conclusion: The 12-month incidence of injury in long-distance runners was 51%, and several significant risk factors were identified. These risk factors explained or predicted 78% of the injuries sustained. Most injuries were due to overuse and occurred in the lower limbs. In the current sample of runners, not stretching and not warming up prior to running were statistically significant risk factors for overuse injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.