ReviewNeurology. Education2026
Ultrasound-Assisted Lumbar Puncture: A Narrative Review With Implications for Educators in the Clinical Neurosciences.
Review in Neurology. Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this narrative review, we examine the evidence on ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture (USLP) and evaluate its applicability for broader adoption in neurology. Lumbar puncture (LP) is essential for diagnosing many neurologic conditions. However, landmark-guided LPs can be technically challenging, with failure rates up to 28%, especially in patients with obesity, prior surgery, or anatomic variations. These difficulties can delay diagnosis and treatment of time-sensitive conditions. Ultrasound-assisted LPs (USLPs) have emerged as a possible method to improve success rates and reduce complications. Limited neurologic literature on USLP suggests this technique may remain understudied and underutilized in neurology, with lack of exposure and formal training contributing to slow adoption. Across multiple studies and meta-analyses, USLP increased first-attempt success rate, reduced traumatic LPs, shortened procedure time, and lowered pain scores. These benefits were particularly pronounced in patients with obesity or spinal anatomical variations. Studies that reported no significant difference between USLP and landmark-based LP tended to have limited sample sizes and variability in study design, including differences in operator experience and definitions of procedural success. Since referring LPs to radiology for fluoroscopic guidance is both costly and time consuming, incorporating USLP into neurology practice may allow neurologists to independently perform difficult LPs. Broader integration of USLP into neurologic practice can enhance bedside procedure success, decrease dependence on radiology, and strengthen neurologists' capacity for efficient, high-quality diagnostic procedures. Further studies should explore current practices surrounding LP training and the effect of USLP on clinical and system-level outcomes in neurology settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.