Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42846917›Full record

ArticleFundamental research2026

Passive decoy state quantum secure direct communication.

Jia-Wei Ying, Jin-Yu Wang, Yu-Xiang Xiao, Shi-Pu Gu, Xing-Fu Wang, Lan Zhou, Yu-Bo Sheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fundamental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jia-Wei YingCollege of Electronic and Optical Engineering and College of Flexible Electronics (Future Technology), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China.
Jin-Yu WangCollege of Electronic and Optical Engineering and College of Flexible Electronics (Future Technology), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China.
Yu-Xiang XiaoInstitute of Quantum Information and Technology, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China.
Shi-Pu GuCollege of Electronic and Optical Engineering and College of Flexible Electronics (Future Technology), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China.
Xing-Fu WangCollege of Science, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China.
Lan ZhouSchool of Physics, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Yu-Bo ShengCollege of Electronic and Optical Engineering and College of Flexible Electronics (Future Technology), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decoy state method is an effective approach for addressing the source imperfections in quantum communication. By employing pulses of varying intensities to estimate error rates and yields, this method requires active modulation of the source intensity. However, the active modulation operation may introduce side-channel vulnerabilities, potentially allowing an eavesdropper to execute Trojan horse attacks. The passive decoy state method circumvents this issue by eliminating the need for active intensity modulation. In this paper, we propose a passive decoy state quantum secure direct communication (QSDC) protocol that generates weak coherent states with random intensities using two phase-randomized coherent pulses. Leveraging linear optics, our protocol facilitates straightforward implementation and is robust against eavesdropping side-channel attacks targeting source intensity modulators.We establish a system model for the protocol and derive its secrecy message capacity. Additionally, we optimize the input intensities of the protocol and obtain the maximum secrecy message capacity for each channel attenuation value. Compared with the previous protocol, our protocol exhibits an approximately 25% enhancement in the secrecy message transmission rate within a channel attenuation range of 6 dB. We also compare the performance of the three-decoy-state protocol with that of the infinite-decoy-state protocol. Within a channel attenuation range of 6.8 dB, the secrecy message capacity of the three-decoy-state protocol achieves approximately 94%-96% of that of the infinite-decoy-state.

Indexed as

Decoy statePassive sourceQuantum communicationQuantum secure direct communicationSingle-photon-based

Identifiers

PMID42846917
PMCPMC13644500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.