ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2026
Ferroptosis nanomedicine for cancer therapy: strategies and challenges.
Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death driven by lipid peroxidation, and it has become an attractive strategy for cancer therapy because it can target redox and metabolic vulnerabilities that differ from those exploited by apoptosis-based treatments. Small-molecule ferroptosis inducers have clarified the therapeutic logic of this pathway, but their use in cancer treatment requires control over pharmacokinetics, tumor selectivity, local activation and systemic safety. Nanomedicine offers a programmable route to address these requirements. Engineered nanoplatforms can supply catalytic iron, remodel the tumor redox state, deplete antioxidant defenses, carry ferroptosis inducers, respond to tumor microenvironmental cues and combine ferroptosis with phototherapy, sonodynamic therapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or immunotherapy. Yet the field remains largely preclinical, and translation will depend on biodistribution, degradability, metal-related toxicity, manufacturing reproducibility, pharmacodynamic biomarkers and rational patient selection. This review summarizes the biological rationale for ferroptosis-targeted cancer therapy, analyzes major translational barriers, and synthesizes nanomedicine strategies that may move ferroptosis induction from experimental proof of concept toward clinically interpretable intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.