ReviewCureus2026
Imaging Pulmonary Embolism in the Era of Subsegmental Clots: What the Internist Needs to Know About Overdiagnosis, Anticoagulation, and Follow-Up.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread adoption of multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography has dramatically increased detection of subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE), raising critical questions about overdiagnosis, optimal anticoagulation strategies, and appropriate follow-up. Despite increased detection, observational data demonstrate remarkably low short-term recurrence rates that do not differ significantly from more proximal pulmonary embolism. However, anticoagulation carries major bleeding risks, creating clinical equipoise about net benefit in low-risk isolated SSPE. Radiologist interpretation challenges compound the problem, with a substantial proportion of segmental and subsegmental emboli missed on initial reads in some series. This review presents current evidence on the epidemiology, diagnostic challenges, treatment controversies, and outcome data for SSPE, providing internists with actionable insights for clinical decision-making. Key findings include the lack of randomized controlled trial data to guide anticoagulation decisions, substantial inter-observer variability in SSPE diagnosis, and emerging evidence that selected low-risk patients may be safely observed without anticoagulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.