ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and cancer immunotherapy: a host-intrinsic immune-inflammatory modifier of treatment efficacy and toxicity.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), the age-related expansion of hematopoietic stem cells carrying leukemia-associated somatic mutations, is common in patients with cancer and is increasingly detected during tumor-only genomic profiling and cell-free DNA sequencing. In this narrative review, we assess epidemiological, mechanistic, and clinical evidence at the interface between CHIP and cancer immunotherapy using a three-level hierarchy: established inflammatory biology, suspected effects on antitumor immunity, and unresolved direct human causality. We also map the evidence by driver gene, clone size, tumor type, treatment modality, and detection context. Immunotherapy-specific data are concentrated in TET2-mutant CHIP; associations for DNMT3A and ASXL1 are weaker, and direct JAK2 data are absent. Clinical ICI cohorts report favorable TET2-associated efficacy signals and no evidence that checkpoint blockade selects CH clones. Separate studies associate CHIP with ICI myocarditis and with severe cytokine release syndrome, prolonged hematologic toxicity, and TP53-mutant clonal expansion after CAR T-cell therapy. These findings remain observational and context dependent. Current evidence does not support CHIP-guided treatment selection. Prospective, standardized studies are needed to determine whether specific CHIP phenotypes predict efficacy, toxicity, or neither.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.