ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Application of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear reimplantation.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the role of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) in assessing auditory pathway integrity and predicting auditory and speech outcomes in patients undergoing cochlear reimplantation (CRI), especially those with cochlear ossification or complex anatomy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 40 CRI patients (12 ossification, 28 non-ossification) from 2019 to 2024. Intraoperative and postoperative EABR assessments were performed to evaluate neural responses and guide cochleostomy. Parameters included the elicitation rate, V-wave amplitude, threshold, and Gibson score. Auditory-speech performance was measured by the Categories of Auditory Performance and Speech Intelligibility Rating scales, and word-recognition scores. Regression analyses identified predictors of postoperative outcomes. Results: The EABR elicitation rate was 100% in non-ossification cases and 80% in ossification cases. Gibson scores were higher, and V-wave thresholds lower, in non-ossification ears ( Conclusions: EABRs reliably assess auditory pathway integrity, inform surgical guidance, and predict postoperative auditory-speech outcomes in CRI, especially in ossified or anatomically complex cochleae. Significance: The findings support the use of EABRs as a clinical adjunct to improve surgical precision and functional outcomes in challenging CRI cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.