ArticleFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Multimodal endoscopic diagnosis in biliary oncology: integrating EUS-guided tissue acquisition and cholangioscopy for personalized cancer care.
Article in Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of biliary malignancies remains challenging because of the heterogeneous growth patterns of cholangiocarcinoma, the limited sensitivity of conventional tissue acquisition techniques, and the growing need for molecular profiling in the era of precision oncology. Over the past decade, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and digital single-operator cholangioscopy have transformed the diagnostic approach by providing complementary information. EUS enables high-resolution imaging, locoregional staging, and tissue acquisition from primary tumors and regional lymph nodes, while cholangioscopy offers direct intraductal visualization and targeted biopsy of suspicious biliary lesions. This review summarizes the current evidence on the diagnostic performance, strengths, and limitations of EUS-guided tissue acquisition and cholangioscopy, emphasizing their complementary role within contemporary diagnostic algorithms. We also discuss emerging technologies, including molecular profiling, next-generation sequencing, artificial intelligence, radiomics, digital pathology, and liquid biopsy, which are shaping the future of biliary oncology. In addition to the available evidence, we present our institutional experience comparing EUS-guided tissue acquisition and cholangioscopy-directed biopsy in patients with suspected malignant biliary strictures. Our institutional experience supports the complementary use of EUS-guided tissue acquisition and cholangioscopy within a multimodal diagnostic approach. In the subgroup of patients who underwent both procedures, we observed high diagnostic sensitivity while maintaining an acceptable safety profile, supporting the potential value of a multimodal diagnostic approach. Integrating advanced endoscopic techniques with precision diagnostics is likely to optimize diagnostic accuracy and guide personalized management of biliary malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.