Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2026
A Phase 1b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple-Ascending Dose Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of DSTA4637S in Patients With Complicated
Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Safe and effective therapies are needed for hospitalized patients with complicated Methods: In this phase 1b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 25 patients with methicillin-sensitive (MSSA, 68%) or -resistant (MRSA, 32%) complicated Results: Most patients (92%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), of which 44% were considered treatment-related. Grade ≥3 TEAEs and serious adverse events occurred in 72% and 56% of patients, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were infusion-related reactions (IRRs), pneumonia, anemia, and respiratory failure. Four patients (21%) receiving DSTA4637S discontinued study treatment due to treatment-related IRRs. Systemic exposure of DSTA4637S in patients increased approximately dose-proportionally from 15 to 100 mg/kg but was 30%-60% lower than previously observed in healthy volunteers. Conclusions: The safety profile of DSTA4637S, characterized by unpredictable IRRs, and its pharmacokinetic behavior in patients differed substantially from those observed in healthy volunteers, highlighting the critical importance of conducting early phase studies in the target patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.