ArticleJAACAP open2026
Examining the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Utility in a Native American Population.
Article in JAACAP open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5 (CBCL) validity for externalizing, internalizing, and total problems T scores when screening for clinically significant behavioral problems in a Navajo (Diné) sample that was not included in CBCL norming. Method: Mothers were recruited during pregnancy through the Navajo Birth Cohort Study/Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (NBCS/ECHO). Families completed in-person clinical assessments when children were 42 to 72 months old. Caregivers completed the CBCL and provided histories. Best estimate clinical diagnoses were established by experienced clinician-researchers using records along with comprehensive neuropsychological, psychiatric, and physical examinations. Results: The CBCL was completed by caregivers for 192 children (98 boys [51.0%]; mean [SD] age 4.0 [0.61] years, range 3-6 years). Of children, 125 (65.1%) received at least 1 diagnosis, with language disorder being the most common followed by speech sound disorder. Every group with a Conclusion: The CBCL was an ineffective single screening tool in the Diné population compared with in-person clinician evaluations, possibly because the Diné were not included in CBCL validation or cross-cultural adaptations. These findings may be relevant to other minority populations not included in CBCL norming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.