ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Non-Newtonian blood rheology significantly alters hemodynamic predictions during cardiac looping: a computational study.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Hemodynamic forces play a key role in early cardiac morphogenesis, yet many computational studies assume Newtonian blood behavior. Here, we evaluate the impact of non-Newtonian shear-thinning rheology on flow patterns, pressure distributions, and wall shear stress (WSS) during cardiac looping using idealized three-dimensional models of the embryonic heart tube. Methods: Five geometries representing progressive looping stages, from a linear tube to an S-shaped configuration with ventricular ballooning, were analyzed under pulsatile flow using both Newtonian and power-law viscosity models. Results and Discussion: Across all stages, Reynolds numbers (Re ≈ 1-7) and Womersley numbers (Wo ≈ 0.3) indicated laminar, quasi-steady flow consistent with embryonic conditions. Incorporating shear-thinning rheology produced substantial deviations from Newtonian predictions, with peak systolic WSS differing by up to ∼94% (range 64%-94% depending on stage) and pressure drops by up to ∼70% (range 48%-70% depending on stage). These effects were most pronounced in regions of increased curvature and geometric complexity. These findings demonstrate that non-Newtonian rheology can substantially alter predicted hemodynamic quantities during cardiac looping and should therefore be considered in future developmental hemodynamic models, particularly when wall shear stress and pressure magnitudes are used to infer mechanobiological responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.