ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2026
Effects of ketamine and dexmedetomidine on ischemia- reperfusion injury in an experimental renal ischemia model.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kidneys are one of the organs most affected by ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury during surgical interventions. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of ketamine and dexmedetomidine administered in a rat model of renal I/R injury prior to ischemia. A total of 24 male Sprague-Dawley rats were included in the present study and divided into four groups. The Sham group underwent laparotomy and right nephrectomy, while the other groups underwent laparotomy, right nephrectomy and 45 min of ischemia to the left kidney, followed by reperfusion for 24 h. No medication was administered to the I/R group. The Ketamine group received 2 mg/kg intraperitoneal ketamine prior to ischemia. The Dexmedetomidine group received an initial dose of 1.0 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine intravenously over 10 min before ischemia, followed by a continuous infusion of 1.0 mcg/kg/h during the operation. Blood was drawn for serum creatinine level measurements before the operation and at sacrifice. Renal samples were taken for histopathological examination right before the rats were sacrificed. The final creatinine measurements of the I/R and Ketamine groups were higher compared with those of the Sham group (P=0.012 and P=0.001, respectively). The final creatinine measurements of the Dexmedetomidine group were lower compared with those of the Ketamine group (P=0.040). In addition, measurements of tubular dilation (P=0.002 and P=0.001, respectively), vacuolization in tubular epithelium (P=0.002 and P=0.003, respectively) and loss of brush border in tubular epithelium (P=0.008 and P=0.001, respectively) were significantly higher in the I/R and Ketamine groups compared with the Sham group, while there was no significant difference between the Dexmedetomidine group and the Sham group. Measurements in the Dexmedetomidine group were lower compared with the I/R group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Despite a reduction in serum creatinine levels and histopathological injury scores in subjects treated with dexmedetomidine compared with the I/R group, the differences were not found to be statistically significant. By contrast, the Ketamine group demonstrated significantly higher serum creatinine levels and histopathological injury scores compared with both the I/R and Dexmedetomidine groups. These findings suggested that dexmedetomidine may be associated with more favorable biochemical and histopathological outcomes compared with ketamine in the present experimental model of renal I/R injury; however, further studies are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.