ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026
Immunoinformatics-based design of a multi-epitope mRNA vaccine candidate targeting the major human-infecting hepatitis E virus genotypes 1-4.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is one of the leading causes of acute and chronic hepatitis among humans across the globe and is linked to severe diseases in immunocompromised individuals and pregnant women. Despite its substantial global burden, only one vaccine is licensed (in China and Pakistan), limiting its global accessibility. Furthermore, no globally approved mRNA vaccine against HEV is currently available, highlighting the need to develop strategies for alternative vaccines. Methods: In this study, the amino acid sequences of ORF2 capsid proteins representative of HEV genotypes 1-4 were curated, retrieved, and analyzed to generate a consensus sequence. The conserved cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL), helper T lymphocyte (HTL), and B-cell epitopes were computationally screened based on their antigenicity, allergenicity, toxicity, IFN-γ induction, and human non-homology. Then, the selected epitopes, seven in total, were assembled into a computational multi-epitope mRNA construct incorporated with β-defensin adjuvant, correct linkers, and regulatory elements [Kozak, tPA, MITD, and globin untranslated regions (UTRs)]. The construct was subsequently subjected to structural modeling, refinement and validation, docked with the TLR1/TLR2 heterodimer, followed by normal mode analysis and a 100-ns molecular dynamics simulation with MM-GBSA binding free-energy estimation, immune simulations, codon optimization, and Results: The computational analyses predicted that the proposed epitopes possessed a favorable antigenicity (VaxiJen score ≥0.4-1), with non-allergenicity and epitope conservancy (80%-100%) across the analyzed HEV genotypes (1-4), and that the assembled vaccine construct was structurally stable. Protein-protein docking of the vaccine construct candidate with the TLR1/TLR2 heterodimer and normal mode analysis of the docked complex indicated a stable structural interface rather than a confirmation of biological receptor engagement; a subsequent 100-ns molecular dynamics simulation supported a persistent, increasingly hydrogen-bonded interface with a favorable MM-GBSA binding free-energy (-91.96 kcal/mol). Computational immune simulations predicted cellular and humoral immune responses with B- and T-cell interaction activity and cytokine production levels. Conclusion: This study describes a computationally designed multi-epitope mRNA vaccine candidate with predicted immunogenicity and structural stability against the major human-infecting HEV genotypes 1-4. These computational results support the proposed vaccine construct as a promising candidate for further research to assess its immunogenicity; safety and protective efficacy will require experimental validation before its translational potential is verified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.