ArticleBrazilian journal of veterinary medicine2026
Effects of the continuous rate infusion of propofol with or without fentanyl on ruminal motility in calves.
Article in Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate ruminal motility before, during, and after propofol anesthesia with or without fentanyl in Holstein calves by investigating effects of these anesthetic protocols on rumen function and cardiorespiratory variables. This study employed a randomized crossover design with a 1-week washout period between treatments and included eight calves aged 6-12 months and weighing 100-180 kg. Animals received either propofol alone (propofol group [PG]) or propofol with fentanyl (propofol-fentanyl group [FG]), alternating the order of treatments between groups. Anesthesia was induced with propofol (5.0 mg/kg IV) in the PG and with propofol (4.0 mg/kg IV) and fentanyl (0.001 mg/kg IV) in the FG. Next, anesthesia was maintained for 60 min by the continuous infusion of propofol (0.6 mg/kg/min IV) alone in the PG or combined with fentanyl (0.001 mg/kg/h IV) in the FG. Cardiorespiratory variables were recorded at baseline and every 15 min during anesthesia. Ruminal motility was assessed before fasting, after fasting, during anesthesia, and throughout recovery until contractions returned to baseline values. We noted that the median (minimum/maximum) ruminal normalization time did not differ significantly between the PG (35 [10/50] min) and FG (45 [20/120] min) (P = 0.19). Food withholding and handling-related stress reduced ruminal motility in both groups. Both protocols completely suppressed ruminal contractions during anesthesia, with contractions beginning to return approximately 10 min after the end of infusion in the PG and 20 min in the FG. Furthermore, propofol caused hypoventilation and respiratory acidosis while maintaining hemodynamic variables within clinically acceptable limits. In summary, fentanyl addition was not associated with a statistically significant prolongation of ruminal-motility recovery, although the wider range of the ruminal normalization time observed in the FG suggests individual variability, warranting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.