ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Prognostic value of 48-h reassessment of a laboratory-derived frailty index in ICU patients with sepsis: model development in MIMIC-IV and external transport evaluation.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Static laboratory-derived frailty index (FI-lab) measures have been associated with adverse outcomes in sepsis, but the value of reassessing acute multisystem laboratory abnormality burden after initial resuscitation and transporting a prespecified model to a new clinical setting remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a retrospective 48-h landmark study using MIMIC-IV for model development and an independent single-center ICU sepsis cohort from January 2020 to December 2025 for supportive single-center transport evaluation. FI-lab-23 was calculated from 23 routine laboratory variables using prespecified thresholds, with at least 17 components required, and was interpreted as an acute laboratory deficit-accumulation index rather than chronic frailty. The primary extended model added FI-lab-23 measured at 24-48 h to clinical variables; the strict secondary model additionally included lactate clearance. Fixed-horizon logistic regression predicted 28-day mortality among patients alive and remaining in the ICU at 48 h. MIMIC-IV coefficients were frozen and applied without refitting to the local cohort. Performance was assessed by discrimination, Brier score, calibration, and exploratory decision-curve analysis. Baseline/change parameterizations were treated as secondary specification analyses; sensitivity analyses addressed testing intensity, component completeness, and a fixed 10-component common-core FI. Results: The primary MIMIC-IV development cohort included 6,153 patients with 1,594 deaths. Each 0.05 increase in 24-48 h FI-lab-23 was associated with higher 28-day mortality (OR: 1.178, 95% CI: 1.149-1.207). Optimism-corrected AUC was 0.710. Of 722 local landmark-eligible patients, 328 met the primary complete-case requirements (85 deaths). In this selected cohort, the frozen model achieved an AUC of 0.774, Brier score of 0.160, calibration intercept of 0.109, calibration slope of 1.273, and observed-to-expected ratio of 1.074. Baseline FI-lab did not improve fit after the 48-h level was known, and baseline-by-change interactions were not significant. The direction of association was preserved across sensitivity analyses, although effect magnitude varied with component-completeness criteria. Conclusions: FI-lab-23 reassessed at 24-48 h provided updated prognostic information for 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis. The frozen MIMIC-IV model showed encouraging but imprecise performance in a selected single-center complete-case cohort. These findings constitute supportive transport evidence rather than definitive external validation, and larger multicenter studies are required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.