Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42846591›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Multilingual social grooming on social media and self-perceived multilingual identity among Chinese university students.

Peilu Qin, Yujia Lin, Xin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peilu QinCollege of Communication Science and Art, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yujia LinSchool of Journalism and Communication, Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing, China.
Xin WangSchool of Journalism and Communication, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chinese university students purposefully use English-only and mixed Chinese-English posts, comments, and replies to share experiences, acknowledge others, and maintain ties, and everyday commentary often reads the practice as showing off. Identity scholarship holds that a multilingual identity is claimed through visible social participation, and quantitative research on digital multilingualism has centred on consumption and learning. This study conceptualises the practice as multilingual social grooming and, drawing on self-conscious emotion and social capital theory, asks whether it relates to self-perceived multilingual identity through authentic pride and online bridging social capital, with need for uniqueness moderating the affective process. Methods: A questionnaire survey of 755 Chinese university students was analysed with a conditional process model and bootstrap confidence intervals. Results: Multilingual social grooming was positively associated with self-perceived multilingual identity, directly and through both intervening processes; the relational indirect association was larger. The grooming-pride association and its indirect association were stronger at higher need for uniqueness ( Conclusion: Relational communication in an additional language is a site of multilingual identity work, tied to a multilingual sense of self through the self-appraisal of competent communication and the wider ties it sustains, strongest for students who value distinctiveness. The findings extend multilingual identity research towards everyday media production.

Indexed as

authentic pridemultilingual identitymultilingualismmultilingual social groomingneed for uniquenesssocial capitalsocial media

Identifiers

PMID42846591
PMCPMC13642788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.