Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42846583›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Healthcare professionals' perspectives toward innovation in palliative care across European settings: an exploratory mixed-methods study.

Sara Cruz, Mariana Silva-Ferreira, Maria Cândida Silva, Michael Sapateiro Luís, Sara Monteiro-Reis, Rui Henrique, Carmen Jerónimo, Ambre Laplaud, Matthieu Frasca, Elixabete Elordi Astegia and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sara Cruz *Doctoral Program in Nursing Sciences, ICBAS - School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences - University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Mariana Silva-Ferreira *RISE-Associate Laboratory (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal.
Maria Cândida SilvaDepartment of Palliative Care, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Michael Sapateiro LuísDepartment of Palliative Care, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Sara Monteiro-ReisRISE-Associate Laboratory (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal.
Rui HenriqueRISE-Associate Laboratory (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal.
Carmen JerónimoRISE-Associate Laboratory (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal.
Ambre LaplaudGérontopôle Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Limoges, France.
Matthieu FrascaCHU de Bordeaux, Service d'accompagnement et de Médecine Palliative, Bordeaux, France.
Elixabete Elordi AstegiaDiputación Foral de Bizkaia, Regional Government of Bizkaia, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain.
Rosana Angles BarbastroServicio Aragonés de Salud, Hospital de Barbastro, Barbastro, Spain.
Fátima González PalauInstituto de Neurociencias y Bienestar, Universidad Siglo 21, Córdoba, Argentina.
Marta García RodriguezFundación INTRAS, Valladolid, Spain.
Raquel Losada DuránFundación INTRAS, Valladolid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovation in palliative care often relies on technological advancements, yet its implementation depends on complex organizational and systemic conditions. An exploratory cross-sectional mixed-methods survey study was conducted to investigate healthcare professionals' perspectives on innovation across multiple European contexts. Survey data assessed perceived implementation, openness to innovation, management support, and familiarity versus use of digital tools, complemented by qualitative open-ended responses. Findings suggest that while participants demonstrated high conceptual openness to innovation, defining it as a multidimensional process encompassing communication, continuity of care, and service reorganization, a marked awareness-implementation gap was identified. Even though familiarity with digital technologies is widespread, routine use remains limited. Barriers were primarily structural, including funding instability, workforce pressures, fragmented infrastructure, and insufficient institutional alignment, rather than ideological resistance. This study underscores that sustainable digital transformation in palliative care requires strengthening system readiness, integrating infrastructure investment, leadership engagement, and human-centered implementation strategies to ensure innovation reinforces relational models of care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelPalliative CareAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDigital HealthEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrganizational InnovationQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnairesdigital healthhealthcare professionalsimplementationinnovationpalliative care

Identifiers

PMID42846583
PMCPMC13642787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.