ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Healthcare professionals' perspectives toward innovation in palliative care across European settings: an exploratory mixed-methods study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Innovation in palliative care often relies on technological advancements, yet its implementation depends on complex organizational and systemic conditions. An exploratory cross-sectional mixed-methods survey study was conducted to investigate healthcare professionals' perspectives on innovation across multiple European contexts. Survey data assessed perceived implementation, openness to innovation, management support, and familiarity versus use of digital tools, complemented by qualitative open-ended responses. Findings suggest that while participants demonstrated high conceptual openness to innovation, defining it as a multidimensional process encompassing communication, continuity of care, and service reorganization, a marked awareness-implementation gap was identified. Even though familiarity with digital technologies is widespread, routine use remains limited. Barriers were primarily structural, including funding instability, workforce pressures, fragmented infrastructure, and insufficient institutional alignment, rather than ideological resistance. This study underscores that sustainable digital transformation in palliative care requires strengthening system readiness, integrating infrastructure investment, leadership engagement, and human-centered implementation strategies to ensure innovation reinforces relational models of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.