ArticleEvolution, medicine, and public health2026
Evolutionary medicine and psychiatry in medical education: a scoping review.
Article in Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evolutionary medicine (EvMed) and evolutionary psychiatry (EvPsych) apply principles of evolutionary biology to deepen understanding of disease vulnerability, mental health, and clinical reasoning. Despite growing conceptual maturity and relevance across biomedical domains, the extent and nature of their integration into medical and psychiatric education remain unclear. Objective: This scoping review aims to map the education-focused literature on EvMed and EvPsych across undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing professional training contexts, and to characterize the types of educational initiatives, frameworks, and evaluation strategies described. Methods: A scoping review methodology was employed to search multiple databases and supplementary sources systematically. Eligible sources included conceptual curriculum frameworks, descriptive studies of curricular provision or learner attitudes, and interventional or evaluative educational studies. Data were charted and categorized by educational context, study design, and primary educational contribution. Findings were synthesized narratively. Results: The final 19 articles include conceptual advocacy, curriculum mapping studies, and a smaller number of implementation and evaluation reports. While there is broad agreement regarding the theoretical value of evolutionary perspectives for enhancing clinical understanding and integrative reasoning, formal curricular integration remains uneven. Reported barriers include limited curricular time, faculty expertise, and perceived controversy. Existing educational interventions are typically modular, case-based, and of short duration, with outcomes primarily focused on learner knowledge and attitudes. Conclusions: EvMed and EvPsych possess a coherent conceptual foundation but remain variably embedded within formal training pathways. Future work should prioritize rigorous evaluation, competency alignment, and scalable implementation strategies to support sustained curricular integration. Lay summary: Evolutionary medicine (EvMed) applies evolutionary biology to explain why humans are vulnerable to disease. This review maps how EvMed and evolutionary psychiatry are taught in medical training. Although widely valued, integration remains uneven. Stronger evaluation and curriculum development are needed to embed evolutionary thinking in clinical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.