ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602026
Safety and effectiveness of carotegrast methyl in patients with ulcerative colitis: an interim report of post-marketing surveillance in Japan.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The first multicenter, prospective post-marketing surveillance (PMS) in Japan was conducted to confirm the safety and effectiveness of carotegrast methyl (hereafter referred to as carotegrast) in the routine clinical practice for ulcerative colitis (UC) in Japan. Here, we report the results of the interim analysis of PMS. Methods: The ongoing PMS was initiated in June 2022 and will be continued until May 2028. Study patients are individuals with moderately active UC who were refractory or intolerant to 5-aminosalicylic acid, and who started carotegrast therapy for the first time. An interim analysis was conducted based on the data cut-off (March 27, 2025). Results: Safety and effectiveness analysis sets included 296 and 290 patients, respectively. In the safety analysis set, 36.8% of patients received carotegrast for <8 weeks and 63.2% for ≥8 weeks. The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was inadequate effectiveness in 44.0% of patients who received carotegrast for <8 weeks, and symptom improvement in 66.8% for ≥8 weeks. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 25 patients (8.45%). No serious ADRs, ADRs relevant to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and central nervous system-related ADRs were reported. No pregnancies were reported. One patient (0.34%) experienced an ADR of pyelonephritis related to infections. The proportions of patients with clinical response, clinical remission and rectal bleeding disappearance (defined by using partial Mayo score) were 146/185 (78.9%), 133/189 (70.4%) and 137/190 (72.1%) after 8 weeks carotegrast administration, respectively. Conclusions: No new safety and effectiveness concerns were identified in the interim analysis for PMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.