ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Perceived community cervical cancer prevention support and cervical cancer screening utilization among women in Shenzhen, China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Community health services have the capacity to inform eligible women about cervical cancer prevention, recommend screening, and assist with access to care. Whether favorable perceptions of community support are associated with completed screening in an urban Chinese setting is unclear. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey of women recruited through more than 20 community health service centers affiliated with two hospitals in Shenzhen and through gynecology outpatient clinics. The source dataset comprised 3,277 completed questionnaires: 2,142 (65.4%) recruited through community health service centers, 853 (26.0%) through gynecology outpatient clinics, and 282 (8.6%) through community outreach events. The analysis included 3,033 women aged 18-65 years. The outcome was self-reported cervical cancer screening within the preceding 3 years. A six-item perceived community cervical cancer prevention-support score was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and examined in multivariable logistic regression with sociodemographic and screening-related covariates. Results: Of 3,033 women, 1,314 (43.3%) reported screening within the preceding 3 years. The support scale had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.918; mean 3.79, SD 0.83). In this cross-sectional sample, the overall support score was not independently associated with completed screening after adjustment (aOR = 0.935, 95% CI 0.856-1.021; Conclusion: In this sample, favorable perceived community prevention support was not independently associated with completed cervical cancer screening. Future prospective studies that distinguish perceived support from documented service contacts, including invitations, bookings, attendance, result communication, and follow-up, are needed to evaluate whether active navigation pathways improve verified screening completion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.