ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The role of congruence: a response surface analysis of family-school alignment in predicting creative thinking.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/objectives: Despite widespread acknowledgment that school and home environments must be aligned to support cognitive development, the question of how their congruence or incongruence predicts creativity has received little empirical attention. Methods: Drawing on data from the PISA 2022 Creative Thinking Assessment, this study employed multilevel cubic polynomial regression and response surface analysis (RSA), with students nested within countries to examine how three congruence pairs: (1) environmental support, (2) behavioral engagement and (3) value orientation predict creative thinking performance controlling for mathematics, science and reading achievement and socioeconomic status. Results: Results revealed that aligned increases along the line of congruence were associated with higher creative thinking in the environmental support and value orientation, but with lower creative thinking in the behavioral engagement model where uniformly high participation in both activity domains was associated with the poorest outcomes. The quadratic congruence parameter was negative and significant, indicating diminishing rather than accelerating returns to congruence. Regarding compensatory mechanisms, the family environment partially buffered school deficiencies, an excess of out-of-school over in-school activity was associated with lower scores than the reverse imbalance and student openness to experience substantially compensated for a low school openness culture, whereas the reverse configurations conferred no comparable advantage. Across all three models the congruence terms accounted for considerably more of the within-country than the between-country variance. The full models explained 55% of the within-country and 78-80% of the between-country variance; once achievement and socioeconomic status were controlled, the unique contribution of the congruence terms ranged from 3.0 to 6.7%. Conclusion: These findings support a dynamic, configural view of creativity as an emergent outcome of multi-contextual fit and underscore the need for integrated intervention designs. The asymmetric compensatory patterns revealed demonstrate that creativity support systems are not interchangeable across contexts and that targeted, context-sensitive strategies are necessary to foster creative potential. Because the congruence effects operate at the level of the individual student rather than the education system, and are modest in magnitude, they identify a direction for such strategies rather than a basis for redesigning provision around them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.