ReviewEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Artificial intelligence to support clinical practice across the inpatient heart failure care pathway: a systematic review.
Review in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome requiring repeated reassessment, close monitoring, and timely treatment decisions throughout hospitalization. With the increasing emergence of artificial intelligence applications, there is growing interest in how artificial intelligence-based tools may support physicians along the inpatient heart failure care pathway. This systematic review assessed artificial intelligence applications supporting adult patients with heart failure from admission through inpatient management to discharge. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261336670). PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched through February 2026. Eligible studies evaluated artificial intelligence-based interventions or tools relevant to inpatient heart failure care. Studies limited to intensive care, isolated imaging settings, classic telemedicine, or theoretical prediction models without demonstrated clinical use were excluded. Study selection was performed using Covidence, and methodological quality was assessed with STROBE criteria for observational studies and RoB 2 for randomized controlled trials. 19 studies were included, comprising 16 observational studies and three randomized controlled trials. Seven studies addressed admission, four inpatient management, and eight discharge-related applications. During admission, artificial intelligence mainly supported early recognition of heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, with the strongest evidence for ECG-based models. In inpatient care, applications were heterogeneous and supported clinical decision-making, patient identification, and medication adherence prediction, using electronic health record-derived data. At discharge, large language models and digital tools mainly supported patient education and self-management, although limited actionability and implementation barriers remained. Artificial intelligence may support inpatient heart failure care, but evidence of measurable clinical benefit remains limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.