ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Closed-loop artificial intelligence agents for animal epidemic prediction and decision support in livestock farming: a review.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal diseases continuously threaten livestock production and public health, yet current surveillance approaches remain largely passive and fragmented. Conventional artificial intelligence models typically function as open-loop predictors, delivering static outputs that fail to accommodate the dynamic operational needs of veterinarians in real-world farm settings. This review explores an emerging paradigm of AI agents for animal disease monitoring, emphasizing how such agents can transition from passive observation to active intervention through a closed-loop perception-decision-feedback architecture. We first classify multi-scale sensing technologies: at the micro-scale, automated molecular diagnostics and biosensors; at the macro-scale, computer-vision-based phenotyping. These technologies collectively provide the data streams required for continuous surveillance. The review then discusses how multi-modal inputs, time-series forecasting, resource-aware decision-making, and reinforcement learning can be integrated into an agent-based workflow. Importantly, most current veterinary research evidence supports only the individual components of this framework, rather than the deployment of fully autonomous, iteratively evolving closed-loop agents in actual field environments. Translating closed-loop AI from a conceptual framework into a reliable veterinary decision-support tool will therefore require further advances in validation, standardization, governance, and human oversight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.