Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42846418›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Closed-loop artificial intelligence agents for animal epidemic prediction and decision support in livestock farming: a review.

Yuzhi Wang, Yingtong Zhou, Liyu Li, Huiling Xu, Wangze Ni, Xiaoliang Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuzhi WangDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Animal Sciences, Beijing Life Science and Technology Research Institute-Zhejiang University Joint R&D Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yingtong ZhouCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Liyu LiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao SAR, China.
Huiling XuDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Animal Sciences, Beijing Life Science and Technology Research Institute-Zhejiang University Joint R&D Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wangze NiCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaoliang LiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Animal Sciences, Beijing Life Science and Technology Research Institute-Zhejiang University Joint R&D Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal diseases continuously threaten livestock production and public health, yet current surveillance approaches remain largely passive and fragmented. Conventional artificial intelligence models typically function as open-loop predictors, delivering static outputs that fail to accommodate the dynamic operational needs of veterinarians in real-world farm settings. This review explores an emerging paradigm of AI agents for animal disease monitoring, emphasizing how such agents can transition from passive observation to active intervention through a closed-loop perception-decision-feedback architecture. We first classify multi-scale sensing technologies: at the micro-scale, automated molecular diagnostics and biosensors; at the macro-scale, computer-vision-based phenotyping. These technologies collectively provide the data streams required for continuous surveillance. The review then discusses how multi-modal inputs, time-series forecasting, resource-aware decision-making, and reinforcement learning can be integrated into an agent-based workflow. Importantly, most current veterinary research evidence supports only the individual components of this framework, rather than the deployment of fully autonomous, iteratively evolving closed-loop agents in actual field environments. Translating closed-loop AI from a conceptual framework into a reliable veterinary decision-support tool will therefore require further advances in validation, standardization, governance, and human oversight.

Indexed as

AI agentsanimal epidemic predictionautomated diagnosticsclosed-loop surveillanceprecision livestock farming

Identifiers

PMID42846418
PMCPMC13643916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.