Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42846412›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Deep learning-based prediction of HER2 status from breast diffusion-weighted MRI.

Yao Zhang, Xinran Kan, Jiaqi Wang, Jie Peng, Jun Cai, Yajun Ma, Cheng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yao Zhang *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Xinran Kan *School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Jiaqi WangSchool of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Jie PengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Jun CaiDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Yajun MaDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Cheng WangSchool of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: The accurate classification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is very important for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. However, the biopsy, the current gold standard for differentiating HER2 status, is invasive and time-consuming. To overcome these drawbacks, a novel deep learning model was developed to differentiate HER2-negative and HER2-positive status in breast cancer solely based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 239 women patients confirmed with breast cancer from two local medical centers. A hybrid CNN-Transformer DL model was proposed, which took DWI images (the ADC maps, DWI images with b = 0 s/mm² and b = 800 s/mm²) as inputs and output the classification of HER2-negative and HER2-positive status. Classification by the proposed DL model was quantitatively compared to the classification by the other benchmark DL models and two clinical experts. Results: Data of the 239 patients (mean age, 49.4 ± 10.0 years) were separated into a training set (n = 156), an internal test set (n = 39), and an external test set (n = 44). On the internal test set, the proposed DL model performed numerically better than the best benchmark DL model (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.93 vs. 0.89; accuracy: 0.90 vs. 0.85). On the external test set, the proposed model also performed numerically better than the best benchmark model (AUC: 0.91 vs. 0.87; accuracy: 0.84 vs. 0.82), and significantly better than the two clinical experts (AUC: 0.91 vs. 0.65 vs. 0.63; accuracy: 0.84 vs. 0.61 vs. 0.57). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the promise of combining DWI and DL for the classification of HER2 status in breast cancer, and it may potentially serve as a non-invasive adjunct or decision-support tool.

Indexed as

breast cancerclassificationdeep learninghuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID42846412
PMCPMC13644321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.