ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Corridor-based relative severity assessment of the canine anaesthetic course.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Relative Severity Assessment (RELSA) score grades welfare severity based on the magnitude of multivariate deviations from a reference value. Many variables monitored during anaesthesia are homeostatic and become harmful when they leave the normal range in either direction. Building on the corridor concept of the PVS from human intensive care, we conducted a feasibility study to assess the application and behaviour of a corridor extension of RELSA in two canine anaesthesia datasets. Each homeostatic variable was given a normal band, and only its deviation was folded into the standard RELSA algorithm. Severity in this report denotes the number this algorithm returns, and that number has not been shown to represent clinical severity. We obtained two Beagle datasets, including one four-arm within-subject study, allowing a paired between-protocol comparison. This is an exploratory secondary analysis of existing data, with no
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.