ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Biomechanical analysis of maxillary incisor intrusion with clear aligners under different periodontal conditions: a finite element analysis.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the biomechanical effects and determine the optimal increment for maxillary incisor intrusion using clear aligners across three periodontal conditions via finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and methods: Nine FE models were created in a 3 × 3 design simulating three periodontal states (M1: normal bone level; M2: one-third alveolar bone loss; M3: one-half alveolar bone loss) combined with three intrusion increments (0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 mm). Anterior tooth displacement, root von Mises stress, and periodontal ligament (PDL) maximum compressive stress were analyzed. Results: Tooth displacement and mechanical stresses escalated with greater bone loss and larger increments. Central incisors experienced more pronounced tipping, whereas lateral incisors achieved greater vertical intrusion. Consequently, lateral incisors endured higher stresses; their PDL stress was approximately double that of central incisors. While central incisor intrusion efficiency increased proportionally with increment, lateral incisors in M2 and M3 states demonstrated higher efficiency at the 0.15-mm increment (peaking at 92.0%) than at 0.20 mm. In the M3 state, increasing the increment from 0.10 to 0.20 mm sharply amplified lateral incisor root stress (2.96-8.18 MPa) and PDL stress (0.056-0.114 MPa). Conclusion: Clear aligners produce maxillary incisor intrusion with concurrent tipping. Lateral incisors show higher intrusion efficiency but endure greater mechanical stress than central incisors. Alveolar bone loss exacerbates both tipping tendency and stress. For patients with alveolar bone loss exceeding one-third, the intrusion increment is recommended to be limited to 0.15 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.