Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42846284›Full record

ArticleDiscovery immunology2026

Human and porcine IgG subclasses differentially engage porcine Fc receptors.

Ashutosh Vats, Charlotte May, Elliot Moorhouse, Elena Lokhman, Sylvia Crossley, Abigail Hay, Marie Bonnet-Di Placido, Simon P Graham, Pramila Rijal, Alain Townsend and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discovery immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ashutosh VatsHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9245-4266
Charlotte MayHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
Elliot MoorhouseHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
Elena LokhmanHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
Sylvia CrossleyHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
Abigail HayHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
Marie Bonnet-Di PlacidoHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
Simon P GrahamHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
Pramila RijalChinese Academy of Medical Science Oxford Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Alain TownsendChinese Academy of Medical Science Oxford Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
William MwangiHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
John C SchwartzHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
Danish MunirHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
John A HammondHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
Elma TchilianHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
Basudev PaudyalHost Response, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6068-019X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody fragment crystallizable (Fc)-mediated effector functions and pharmacokinetics are governed by interactions between immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses and Fc gamma receptors (FcγRs) and Fc neonatal receptor (FcRn). Although pigs are increasingly used as translational models for therapeutic antibody evaluation, the interactions between porcine Fc receptors (pFcγRs) and porcine (pIgG) or human IgG (hIgG) subclasses remain poorly defined. Here, we characterized the interactions of pIgG and hIgG subclasses with pFcγRs and pFcRn and assessed their ability to mediate Fc-dependent effector functions in porcine immune cells. Using biolayer interferometry, we demonstrated subclass-dependent differences in receptor binding, driven primarily by dissociation kinetics. Porcine IgG2 and pIgG5c exhibited stable FcγR interactions, whereas pIgG3 and pIgG5b showed weak binding to several low-affinity receptors (FcγRIIa, FcγRIIb, and FcγRIIIa). Human IgG subclasses displayed distinct binding profiles to pFcγRs, with hIgG3 showing the strongest and hIgG2 the weakest binding affinity. Furthermore, hIgG1 and hIgG4 did not bind to pFcγRIIIa. Functional studies demonstrated that hIgGs mediate Fc-dependent phagocytosis and natural killer cell degranulation, although receptor-binding affinity did not always correlate with functional activity. Comparative phylogenetic and functional analyses further revealed that FcγR-binding phenotypes are only partially predicted by Fc domain sequence similarity. All pIgG and hIgG subclasses interacted with pFcRn in a comparable pH-dependent manner. These findings demonstrate substantial, but incomplete, conservation of Fc biology between humans and pigs. While supporting the use of pigs as a translational model for antibody pharmacokinetic studies, they also indicate the need for integrated biophysical, structural, and functional analyses before extrapolating Fc-mediated therapeutic activity between species.

Indexed as

affinity Fc-FcγRs interactionshuman IgG subclassesporcine Fc-mediated functionsporcine FcRnporcine FcγRsporcine IgG subclasses

Identifiers

PMID42846284
PMCPMC13643491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.