ArticleWetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)2026
Beyond Floristic Quality: A Data-Driven Approach to Assessing Coastal Wetland Condition Using Plants.
Article in Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant communities are commonly used to assess ecological condition due to their sensitivity to local environmental factors and the practicality of conducting vegetation surveys. Using a large dataset (41,314 survey plots from 563 wetlands across 12 years), we developed and tested a new plant-based Index of Biotic Condition (pIBC) for coastal wetlands for each of the five Laurentian Great Lakes. The pIBC shares conceptual similarities with Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) metrics but incorporates species-specific sensitivity and responsiveness to anthropogenic disturbance based on modeled probabilities of occurrence derived from field data. This distinguishes it from traditional FQA metrics, which rely on expert-assigned Coefficients of Conservatism and do not incorporate occurrence probability. We found that each lake-specific version of the pIBC consistently predicted anthropogenic disturbance, as indicated by water quality and surrounding land use. Additionally, comparisons with seven other plant-based metrics showed that the pIBC generally provides greater within-lake sensitivity to water-quality and land-use impacts, providing higher-resolution insight into spatial and temporal variation at the lake scale, which is often the most relevant scale for management decisions. The pIBC was also applicable across wetlands of different hydrogeomorphic types and under different water-level conditions. The pIBC's strong performance suggests that it is well-suited for assessing coastal wetland condition across sites and within sites through time. Overall, this new index is a conceptually grounded and statistically robust tool for conservation practitioners that is easy to calculate and interpret. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-026-02094-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.