ArticleChemical science2026
Chemistry-informed Bayesian control and policy distillation for autonomous pH adjustment in diverse chemical systems.
Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adjusting pH of an arbitrary solution to a specified target remains difficult to automate when buffering behavior is unknown, nonlinear, and composition-dependent. We formulate pH adjustment as a sequential inference-and-control problem and develop a chemistry-informed Particle Filtering (PF) Bayesian controller that updates an explicit dose-pH response model. Across five independently generated benchmark sets of 3000 simulation tasks, the PF controller achieved 95.4 ± 0.6% success, requiring 4.84 ± 0.09 additions among successful tasks. PF state-action trajectories were subsequently distilled into a lightweight neural policy, which achieved 89.2 ± 0.5% success. In a separate matched 100-task timing cohort, the median observation-to-action latency was 40.1 ms per recorded PF decision cycle and approximately 0.15 ms per neural-policy call. Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), a reinforcement-learning method, was then evaluated as an optional refinement of the distilled policy and achieved 93.9 ± 0.6% success with 5.2 ± 0.1 additions among successful tasks. The PF and PPO controllers were then implemented on an automated liquid-handling and pH-sensing platform and applied to mixed-acid solutions, laboratory wastewater, pH-controlled milk acid precipitation, and Cu(ii)-sulfosalicylic acid complexation. Together, these results establish a workflow connecting inspectable online response-model inference with policy distillation and optional data-driven refinement for autonomous pH control.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.