ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Atypical depression: state of the art and future perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atypical depression was first described in the 1950s, but after a surge of interest and publications in the 1980s, this construct appears to have fallen out of focus, with comparatively less literature produced over recent decades. Despite different conceptualisations proposed by different authors, atypical depression is considered by current nosographic classification systems to be characterised by mood reactivity, reversed neurovegetative symptoms such as hyperphagia or hypersomnia, marked fatigue and rejection sensitivity. Core features described in historical accounts also include prominent anxiety symptoms, reversed diurnal variation of mood, and a specific response to monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). Many authors have reported latent or future bipolarity in subjects presenting with this depressive subtype, while others have explored a broader spectrum encompassing bipolar spectrum conditions and certain presentations of borderline personality disorder. From a pathophysiological perspective, current evidence suggests that atypical depression represents a biologically and clinically meaningful depressive phenotype, characterised by converging neuroendocrine, immuno-inflammatory, and metabolic alterations, including specific hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation and associations with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Additionally, the frequent overlap with the bipolar spectrum has implications for diagnostic formulation and treatment planning in at least a subset of patients. Notably, alongside the classically identified efficacy of MAOIs, a wide range of treatments appears also to be effective in the management of atypical depression, and emerging options like GLP-1 receptor agonists may theoretically prove preferentially efficacious in this depressive subtype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.